6/21/2021—I have wondered a lot about the future of
secularism. My forthcoming book, The Universe Is on Our Side: Restoring Faith
in American Public Life, is about the worldview of secularism. American culture
is demoralized by the Death of God. We hate each other because we have no story
of meaning in common.
But there is nothing much in the book about the sociology of
secularism—what its lifestyle looks like. I assumed that something like
religious institutions had to grow in the place of religion.
Austin Dacey, the author of The Secular Conscience, had the best answer for that back in 2009—he called
it the fallacy of decomposition in an entry in Religion Dispatches: “The
fallacy of decomposition is the mistake of supposing that as the estate of
religion collapses, there must be a single new institution that to arises to
serve the same social functions it served—that the social space vacated by
religion must be filled by a religion-shaped object.”
It was never going to be that and Dacey explained why pretty
sharply: When you think about it, organized humanism is a hard sell. Do you
like paying dues and making forced pleasantries over post-service coffee cake,
but can’t stand beautiful architecture and professionally trained musicians? If
so, organized humanism may be for you. Greg Epstein (the “humanist chaplain” at
Harvard and the author of Good Without God) is a lovely person, but
I’ve heard him sing, and I think I’ll stick to Bach, Arvo Pärt, and Kirk
Franklin for my spiritual uplift. Do we really need an institution for people
who find Reform Judaism and Unitarian Universalism too rigid? Yes. It’s called
But I am coming to see that there is one arena in which something like religion is necessary—the raising of children. How is the spirituality of secular children to be addressed? If it is not addressed—and at present it really is not—the culture will substitute consumption and nihilism for any sense of depth of human life.