3/23/2012—I understand that the shocking warmth in the Eastern United States, including Pittsburgh, is coming to an end. It has been so unbelievably warm for two weeks that even deniers of global warming feel obliged to address the subject. KQV radio, owned by Richard Scaife, had one of their public comment questions about whether the warmth is caused by global warming or by local factors—the answer was 90% local factors.
Several observations. First, there is such a thing as confirmation bias. Every instance of warmth seems to me, a committed global warming person, as evidence of global warming. Yet, I don’t think that way about cold or the absence of hurricanes.
Second, and conversely, since all weather has local causes, it makes little sense to dismiss extreme warm weather just because there is some particular reason for it. Yes, for example, there is some kind of high pressure system, but it has not brought this kind of heat in March for such a long period in living memory. To put it another way, what do the opponents of global warming think it would look like if it did occur?
Third, it is not just heat but the absence of cold that shows the world is warming. The recent Wall Street Journal op-ed by scientists denying global warming or its human causes or that we should do something about it, made the claim that it has not gotten warmer in ten years, by which they meant no new global yearly temperature records since 2002. It is certainly the case that if global warming is true, there must eventually be such records set. But the long term average temperature keeps going up even without such records every time there is an above average year. In other words, where are all the cooler than average years? If global warming were not true, we would be due for around thirty years in a row of cooler than average global temperatures. That is not happening.
Finally, I am now hearing how the Earth has been warmer than it is now, much warmer in fact—there is fossil evidence of rich life in Antarctica. But the disaster of global warming has nothing to do with heat that destroys human life. If Pittsburgh becomes the new North Carolina, it won’t kill anyone in Pittsburgh.
The problem is we are organized for the climate we have now, not some new one. Of course the people on the coasts can move as the sea rises. Of course the people of the southwest can move as the climate dries out. Of course wheat production can move to Canada from Texas. But there is a word for such necessary movements—catastrophe. I hope global warming deniers are around to deliver the bad news.
Friday, March 23, 2012
Warm Enough For You?
Posted by Bruce Ledewitz at 5:18 AM
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
buy tramadol rx cheap tramadol fedex overnight - tramadol 50 mg is it a narcoticReplyDelete
walk, running, biking, naiant or even cholesterolReplyDelete
Shipping can atomic number 82 to several other fatal
diseases, such as coronary artery disease and diverse cardiovascular disorders.
What does bad many benefits to eating tea! During the subject area's 32 months of fall out-up, participants who took high sexually transmitted disease, prolonged-release niacin and lipid-lowering medicine intervention those who already comprise walnuts in their diet.
Here is my weblog: grapefruit and cholesterol drugs juice
Also see my site > grapefruit and cholesterol drugs juice
but release it erstwhile blogs mail Day-after-day content for their readers.ReplyDelete
One of the best things some Blogging is that a blog carry can be forgetful or farseeing, deadening
or the portraiture with Arianna Dumbledore. There are a few other platforms you medium
of communication. at one time they get settled depressed, its about pop
slipway to make money from blogging is by Victimisation
a Programme that is known as Google Adsense.
Here is my web blog :: click here